[AKidsRight.Org] Family Law Act from Australia / FEEDBACK on Senator Clinton

webmaster@AKidsRight.Org

This is a message from the AKidsRight.Org mailing list.  Unsubscribe instructions at bottom of message.
=======================================
Good People & People of Faith,

This message contains info on:
1.  A message from an Australian MP. -- Proposed Family Law Act
2.  Your FEEDBACK -- NonViolent Action and Senator Clinton

1. A message from an Australian MP. -- Proposed Family Law Act
---------------------------------------------------------------
A member of the Australian Parliament, Mr. Allen Cadman, sent a reply
to one of our recent messages.  We have included the text of his
message below along with some notes on a proposed Family Law Act.

The wording is similar to many other proposed laws, but we ask you to
consider:

How do you pass a Family Law Act without first defining protections in
a Family Rights Act?

The proposed Family Law Act dismisses EQUAL parenting out of hand. It
dismisses EQUAL legal custody of the children when there is
"entrenched conflict" or "domestic violence" between the parents.  Are
the two directly related based on statistics?  Do not GREAT rights
deserve more protection?

We welcome your feedback to this!

--- Allen Cadman <A.Cadman.MP@aph.gov.au>

> Dear Parent Thank you for telling me about your concerns for the
> role of fathers and the difficulties that occur when marriages break
> up.  Having been a member of the committee which investigated the
> custody of children and which took evidence from 1200 people, I know
> trauma and heartburn can be experienced in families when such a
> tragedy occurs.

> The Government has taken decisions about the next step.  I know that
> everyone has their own particular ideas about what action they would
> prefer to see.  There will be an assumption of shared parenting and
> a parenting plan.  The Family Court will be radically changed and
> become much more friendly and less confrontational.

> I believe that this is a sensible beginning. It is my intention to
> keep an eye on the developments so a re-examination can be
> undertaken in a year or two.  This step is the first in a process to
> bring a serious and significant change to family relationships where
> there is break up.

> Can I suggest that we carefully observe the proposed changes to the
> legislation.  The legislative changes to the Family Law Act will be
> most important.  The details written into the law will be critical
> and we need to give a lot of attention to that when the changes come
> before the Parliament.  We need to make sure they reflect the views
> of the community, especially fathers.

> For your information I have attached the executive summary of the
> findings of the parliamentary committee and the details of the
> Government's response.  Yours sincerely Alan Cadman.

See the following links for more information:

Report on the inquiry into custody arrangements in the event of family
separation - 
http://www.AKidsRight.Org/australia-reform1.pdf

Framework Statement on Reforms to the Family Law System -
http://www.AKidsRight.Org/australia-reform2.pdf

2.  Your FEEDBACK -- NonViolent Action and Senator Clinton
----------------------------------------------------------
One of our group members, John Murtari, is currently in jail as part
of a NonViolent Action to get a meeting between members and Senator
Hillary R. Clinton.  Complete details are at
http://www.AKidsRight.Org/actionc_syr.

--- Gail <raina@beol.net>

> You can always join my group if and when you realize that this
> country is just like the former Soviet Union. We live in socialism
> right now, here. This is not the America that it was created to be.

> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trekoftheamericans

--- John Buethe <MadMenUnited@aol.com>

> I just read the report on John being jailed.  I have to admit I
> don't know what I am talking about because I only see what you guys
> have written.

> BUT I would hope you have all this documented.  

> You should have pictures and videos of him being obstructed. 

> You should have a notarized statement or letter of why he wants to
> meet Clinton.  A copy of this letter should be sent to Clinton like
> the filing of a legal doc.  Notarized and return receipt mail.

> Then you should take the issues and documentation to the Republican
> party headquarters in NY.  Show them how this guy is being denied
> access to Clinton.  That he is being arrested and harassed for
> trying to see his representative.  That in effect Hillary is ANTI
> FATHER AND FAMILY.

> Hillary has hopes of Presidency.  Not only could this type of
> activity sink her political hopes this situation could actually
> bring these issues to a political and media forefront.

> If you don't maybe I will.  But your organization deserves the
> credit for this effort.

... Regarding Hillary.  You forgot to mention she is a VERY good
politician and wants to be President.  If we can't get enough public
support to convince her Family Reform is important -- what does that
say about the reform effort?  We need to 'move' people in this country
to rethink Family rights and I'm sure she'll want to be on the right
side of the issue.

--- Bill Maher <cautiouscowboy@yahoo.com>

> Your focus on Hilary Clinton seems appropriate.  I was not present
> for the beginning of the discussion, so I don't understand the whole
> thing.

> I am going to suggest that you focus some energy in California.  I
> am working on gently trying to persuade Gary LaMusga to go talk with
> Schwarzenegger, along with Glenn Sacks. It seems like if we're going
> to focus on a high-profile political figure it should be
> Schwarzenegger, because he's more likely to be sympathetic.  The
> California legislature was going to send him a bill that gutted
> Gary's case and amended it back to the Burgess standard, but then
> they just withdrew the bill.  Apparently they realized how unpopular
> it would be, since Schwarzenegger has come out publicly against
> "gut-and-amend" bills and has two daughters of his own.  I suggest
> that Schwarzenegger's conservativism would put him on the side of
> family values and therefore fathers' rights almost immediately.
> LaMusga's case is the highest-profile case in the US as far as
> precedent goes, and seems to set the standard, except in states that
> haven't heard of it yet and are still going with Burgess based on
> the Wallerstein brief.  I suggest that Ahnold himself is probably a
> girlie-man as far as fathers' rights and relocation go.

> A funny and very sad story from here in Albuqueruque- Apparently
> some guy has been paying child support for five years for a child
> that does not exist.  It looks like the ex-wife (who apparently had
> a tubal a long time ago) got together with a sister that works in a
> hospital and used the sister's DNA to fake a child.  This is
> especially wierd because there is no public record of the child, and
> if I remember right the man had a vas and his sperm count was zero.
> But he has been paying child support for five years.

--- Ed Ward <edward19@cox.net>

> You may or may not know me.  I am an admirer of your efforts with
> "Hitlary", just awesome work.  Might I suggest
> http://thepriceofliberty.org if you might like to contribute an
> article of your efforts.  Please let me know if that is to your
> liking.  I know the editor and if it is a good article, I will try
> to assist in it's exposure.  Just a thought.  Awesome Efforts.

--- Caribbean Star <caribestar@adelphia.net>

> I hate to burst your bubble but I would really like to have you all
> wake up and smell the coffee. Lawyer Clinton who has an obvious
> leftist ideology has no interest in Father's nor for that matter
> Parents rights. having said that she really does not care a hoot for
> the children of America except on how she and her lawyer cronies can
> use them in their commie schemes of "It takes a village to raise a
> child". She would love to turn this into a communist style commune
> like in Israel. Unfortunately, it does not work their so I know it
> would not work here. In fact it only works their thanks to the 3
> billion in aid that is sent from out tax payers pockets. It is a
> scam their as it is here. I would subject for all to read a book
> call The Cogs in the Wheel The Making of the Soviet Man by Micheal
> Heller. Mrs. Clinton liberal views would never allow her to return
> the children to their rightful Fathers It would be bad business for
> her lawyer buddies. Until we don't grow some COJONES and tell the
> lawyers to stop running for all 3 branches of government we will be
> cowering under their judicial abuse for the next 5 centuries.

> DIVORCE LAWYERS ARE FAMILT TERRORIST and they should be made to pay
> reparations

> DON'T VOTE FOR LAWYERS

--- Dung Le <dungleny@yahoo.com>

> DEAR JMURTARI: WE NEED A OANEL FOR OUR FAMILY COURT ADJUDICATIONS!
> THIS IS THE KEY AS WE ARE SO CALLED TO HAVE HTE RIGHT TO HAVE THE
> PRESENCE OF OUR PEERS ? IN THESE JUDICIAL MATTERS!  WELL DAH WE
> VOTED THESE COURRUPT SCAMILY COURT SLUDGES INTO PUBLIC OFFICES AND
> SEE THAT HITLER WAS ALSO VOTED INTO OFFICE!  BLIND AMBITION WILL
> ALWAYS CAUSE ONE HARM!  ALAS I FORTEL FOLKS: TAKE THE JUDGES PAY
> SPLIT IT BETWIXT 7 FINE LAW ABIDING FOLKS, BE THEY BLACK WHITE
> CHINESE WHATEVER MIXED ETC, LET THEM BE OUR VOICE OF JURISPRUDENCE
> IN SCAMILY COURTS!  THEN WE CAN AT LEAST SAY WE HAVE THE PRESSENCE
> OF OUR PEERS THERE!  ALSO BY OUR VOTING SYSTEM!  ALAS IF YOU VOTED
> FOR A SCAMILY COURT JUDGE YOU VOTED FOR HITLER!  YOUR GONNA CRASH
> AND BURN IF YOU DO NOT PULL UP SEE THE HORIZON!  YOUR EARS DO NTO
> HEASR AS I WROTE YOU BETIMES!  ALAS!  JHON WHEN YOU HAVE A QUIET
> MOMENT IN JAIL PLEASE THINK OF WHAT I AM SAYING HERE!

Thanks for the idea of peer review.  If you look at our Family Rights
Act, http://www.AKidsRight.Org/act.htm, you will see that we do call
for a jury of our peers.  A jury is probably the best method to ensure
your rights are protected.

--- Beth Wallace <firefly@ados.com>

> ARE YOU KIDDING ME ? HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS SYSTEM
> ? I HAVE BEEN THROUGH THIS AND ADVOCATED FOR OTHERS AND DID JUDICIAL
> REFORM FOR MORE THEN 20 YEARS NOW IN THREE STATES. ANYONE WILL TELL
> YOU THAT WRITING THESE SENATES AND ( WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD YOU EVEN
> BOTHER WITH SOMEONE LIKE HILARY CLINTON ??? WANT SOME BACKGROUND ON
> HER ??) THIS IS NO WAY TO DO THINGS.........THESE ARE THINGS YOU DO
> TO WASTE YOUR TIME, MONEY, ENERGY AND FOCUS. DO NOT WRITE LETTERS
> LIKE THIS TO ANY OF THESE PEOPLE..THEY ARE NOT HUMAN THEY DO NOT
> HEAR YOU........THEY ARE THE ONES WHO CREATED THESE GAMES DO YOU
> UNDERSTAND THIS ?

> STATE BY STATE PETITIONS TO STOP THE AMERICAN AND STATE BARS END
> THROUGH STATE VOTE ALL TIED WITH ENGLAND AND THEIR BANKING SYSTEM
> AND CONTROLS PICKET WITH THOUSANDS ON THE US CONGRESS WITH SIGNS AND
> BIG PAYCHECKS SAYING "YOU DID NOT DO YOUR JOB YOU ARE ALL FIRED !!!! 
> TAKE YOUR LAST CHECK AND GO AWAY".

> YOU ALSO HAVE TO EDUCATE AT THIS SAME TIME ABOUT THE GRAND JURIES
> BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL AND WHAT ( THEIR REAL DUTIES AND POWERS ARE
> ALL ABOUT) THERE IS WHERE THE CITIZENS CAN STOP THIS AND INDICT
> THESE PEOPLE.

> NEXT................JUDGES ARE STILL ELECTED OFFICIALS EVEN THOUGH
> NO ONE RUNS AGAINST THEM...CREATE A STATE PEITION FOR VOTE OF THE
> PEOPLE TO LIMIT THEIR TIME SERVING, THEIR POWERS CHECKED AND
> SALARIES MONITORED WITH LIMITS AND THAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE TWO OR
> MORE TO RUN IN AN ELECTION AGAINST ONE ANOTHER AND THE PEOPLE MUST
> SEE THEIR RESUME'S AND MENTAL HEALTH PROFILES FOR SUCH SERIOUS JOBS
> ... 
> Beth Wallace anymore ideas just write me.  (Oregon )

We could not agree with you more.  While letter writing, education,
and petitions are valid methods -- personal action and sacrifice are
also required.

--- Lynne <klhadts@earthlink.net>

> That is a wonderful letter to Senator Clinton.  I myself have
> written letters to her through her website on your behalf.  You
> start with our Supreme Court of our Civil Rights like the cases that
> have been won and the rest will come.. Children's Rights Council is
> constantly in front of Congress on the issue of unfair child support
> that feeds this mess.  You are not alone out there.  You are being
> unfair to all the parents that write to you.  Teach them what it is
> to be a united America, unite together to Saver Our Supreme Court or
> we all will be taking giant steps backward and have no chance at
> all.  You are lucky to have a Senator who is leading the way for
> your and our civil rights.  Stand and unite with her in a way all
> Americans stand and unite for our country.  You are on the frontline
> in New York, be the leader you can be for the rights of your son and
> all of our children.  Why be one person in front of her office when
> you can be united with her in this cause and be able to talk to her
> in person.  When hurricane Charlie hit our area, John Kerry came
> here.  I got to ride in the motorcade and talk to him because I am
> working as a volunteer to win our country back and restore our
> rights we are loosing.  Think with your head and not your heart (it
> is hard to do) you must.

--- Lynne <klhadts@earthlink.net>

> Your family rights issue is the 14 Amendment and you are winning
> joint physical custody in the courts.  You need to keep on this
> path.  The more cases you win through your civil rights violation of
> the 14 Amendment, there will never be this battle over our children
> again.  Next will be or the same time, reform of the child support
> (private collection services) that fuel this battle and the guy who
> networked Federal Government to put this in place.  He has gotten
> rich from the sadness and tears of all our children.  This will
> happen.  Protect our Supreme Court, help your Senator Clinton and
> Kate Michelman.  Go to WWW.Courtsave.org. Tell all you fathers and
> mothers, this is important to your children's future.

--- Lynne <klhadts@earthlink.net>

> You are hurting your cause and your son more than you are helping.
> As I stated before to you, put your support of all the mothers and
> fathers in this country together and protect our Supreme Court, our
> Civil rights, the 14th Amendment others are winning in other states.
> Join Hilary Clinton in her champagne to save our Supreme Court.

> You must enjoy jail and nothing is happening for you and it never
> will the way you are going about it.  This is money and time you are
> taking way from your son.  Unite!

You may have a point.  But history shows that NonViolent Action (a
voluntary loving sacrifice) is always meaningful and effective in
bringing change.  http://www.AKidsRight.Org/civil_back.htm.

                                       Webmaster
_____________________________________________________________
Webmaster                              AKidsRight.Org
                                       "A Kid's Right to BOTH parents"
                                       http://www.AKidsRight.Org/

=======================================
Newsletter mailing list
Newsletter@kids-right.org  subscribe/unsubscribe info below:
http://kids-right.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter