|
|
[AKidsRight.Org] Your FEEDBACK: On challenging a license suspension for 'support'.
From: AKidsRight.Org Webmaster (webmaster@akidsright.org)
Good People & People of Faith, This message has your FEEDBACK, and a lot of it! There was a great response to what happened to John Murtari and his effort regarding a license suspension (please see http://www.AKidsRight.Org/support) for details. All the messages here were 'positive' -- there were some others and we will have another message with just those. We may all find some very useful thoughts there also. One note: Some messages below make John seem like a Father's Rights activist. He is not. The AKidsRight.Org goal is getting the Civil Rights of Parent's recognized -- BOTH mothers and fathers should be recognized as FIT and EQUAL parents to their children. See -> http://www.AKidsRight.Org/approach.htm --- Harry <hdpham2001@yahoo.com> > I admire your courage ! We are behind you, John. --- "Terv" <arvida@renc.igs.net> > I am from Canada and I really support your actions. You are not > committing a crime it is peaceful and at the same time people are > looking and remembering! --- Rose Johnson <ijaa2004@yahoo.com> > John: I sent a notice to the media you listed. God bless you > tomorrow! It is a very important trial. --- Kim Berry <kberry@surewest.net> > That's awesome. Good you stood your ground, and we'll see where this > leads. > webmaster: http://www.cafcusa.org/ --- cimini.family@att.net > Just two words: Congrats and Appeal! Yes, thanks for the message. I'd like to appeal but just don't have the time/resources to do it properly. Had tried to get a Civil Rights law firm to take it, but they declined. --- claire pink <clairerify@yahoo.com> > I would be happy and proud to contact anyone for you! I got all the > contacts you listed in your post on PAF etc. I will be calling all > of them. Good luck at your hearing! I wish I could be there in > person to give you moral support but its a long way from Florida. > My thoughts are with you! --- Theresa Martin <allaboutme38@yahoo.com> > Oh John! This is wonderful news for you and Dom as well as your > Mother. Congratulations on the fact he did not put you in jail. > Anything goes in there and I know you had to have had a very > sleepless night. > We are all proud of your character and what you represent. Your son > is so blessed to have a father he can admire. Give your mother a > big hug and tell her the people say thanks for the excellent job she > did in raising a son with proper values. --- Addi <Addiwallner@aol.com> > Once again you amaze me with your convictions and endurance to make > the laws just... > This is a copy of the letter that I sent. I hope you do not mind > that I had copied some thing that you wrote. I sent this letter to > most addresses that you placed on the bottom of our news letter... > I wish you the best of luck... --- Ann Adams <ann.adams95340@gmail.com> > I'll try to write something but I'm not sure how willing they'd be > to listen to a California voice. > Good luck. How far are you willing to take it? Do you have > organizational support? You must, from the responses you've been > getting but I haven't had time to read it all. --- Fran <GFGriner@aol.com> > You are absolutely doing the right thing. A guy I know is just too > worn down in fighting against his license suspension and all for > child support, and in periods of depression, he cannot fight it at > this time, UNLESS he gets arrested for driving after 3 years, more > than 500 times probably!! Then, if does get arrested, I hope he has > the strength to do what you are doing. I will give him your latest > notice to give him support. > I have the names of over 7000 names and addresses of suspensions in > my county alone!! This law is totally unconstitutional. Florida Case Law > Larsen v. Larsen, No. 4D04-773 (Fla.App. 05/04/2005)_ > (http://www.specialtylaw.com/FLFL/NONSUB.HTM) Appellant challenges > an order authorizing the suspension of his driver's license for > nonpayment of child support with a purge provision of $2,500. He > claims that he does not have the present ability to pay the purge > amount. Because the suspension of a driver's license constitutes a > civil sanction, the court must provide the contemnor with the > opportunity to purge the sanction, and it must determine that the > contemnor has the present ability to pay the purge amount. . . . Not > only did the trial court fail to make such a finding, nothing in the > record would support a finding that appellant has the ability to pay > that amount. We therefore reverse. --- howard deaton <outlet110volts@yahoo.com> > I read through the links that was posted on this mail. And John Has > my total respect and support and I feel all on the boards should > give him your support. Everything this Father has done has been > selfless and has help others even all he has gone through. The > Sacrifices he has made for His Son Is so Wonderful and brings A tear > to my Eye for sure. The Civil rights Violations We fight through > everyday we As Fathers This Man needs are support so please post > this far and wide. He deserves your support for all he has done for > us,The selfless actions he has made for the rights of all and most > of all for our children. --- Diane Booth <Childrescue2006@aol.com> > I support what you are doing, John. I think it is a despicable > practice to suspend one's driver's license because they can not keep > up child support payments! Besides despicable, it doesn't make any > sense. If one is unable to pay, if they further can no longer drive > to work, how is that supposed to enable them to pay? As I mentioned > in a post on my blog, I have known personally girls in jail who were > there because they couldn't pay child support to the State, who > wrongfully apprehended their children! The money is not going to > support the children, rather it is lining someone else's > pocket. Peace and Justice, > Diane Booth, Childrescue, http://www.msnusers.com/FreeVincentBooth --- Chris <cjs@mykid2.org> > I agree that we dads need to stand up for our rights, but after > years of soul destroying marriage, culminating in acrimonious > protracted divorce and followed by relentless persecution many of us > haven't the strength to keep our lives together let alone fight for > a cause. > I wish to express my admiration for your tenacity and I can only > assume your strength comes from divine inspiration. What you do is > helping to get the message across... hopefully young men will stop > being such hopeless romantic fools. God Bless --- "Byron Prior" <alltrue@nl.rogers.com> > John, I pray you have the best of luck, in court, December 12. I > wish I could be there for support, but you know, I can't manage > that, my thoughts and prayers will be there. My new date in court is > January 18/06. Keep up your fight and I hope you have success to > help everyone. Byron Prior --- Robert Lisk <rg-lisk@worldnet.att.net> > This should be added to the website of Dumb Laws.... those that make > no sense. > Take away a guy's method of income, takes away from his > support. DUH. > ... For instance, I shoot real estate pictures, and if the DMV takes > my driver's license, they just took away my income, and ability to > pay any shape or form of child support payments. > Further, DUH... a good father, mother should be able to able to > share their children, equally! --- Dennis Barlotta <dbarlotta@yahoo.com> > Each night I read your messages and they break my heart. We are far > from perfect; each of us has made mistakes. And when we are at our > lowest point, these vultures descend upon us. To suppose a judge, an > attorney, any member of the Family Court System has anything other > than then own pocketbook in mind, is, based upon my experience, > insanity. > They are the pigs George Orwell wrote about. To suppose that one can > proceed within their system and expect justice is madness. The very > best we can do is survive until there is nothing more they can take > from us. > And there is one more thing we can do. We can speak to those men yet > to marry and tell them what awaits them. I would say to them, assume > everything I tell you is untrue, and so check for yourself. Ask what > the child support guide lines are in your state. Ask what the > penalties are for some someone who does not pay what he is ordered > to pay. Call a lawyer in your home town, tell him you and your wife > have split up, ask what is it going to cost for the divorce. > ... Provide them work sheets and verifiable references that will > enable them to understand what is at risk. > Now do I believe all of them will listen to us? NO. But if one > person at a time does, and we can begin to influence men not to > marry and father children then I believe laws will change, not > because the government cares about the people but because it cares > about itself. > The only way to win in the Family Court is to never go there in the > first place. Thanks for taking the time to write a thoughtful message. It really is a bad system and an indignity to any parent. I do draw hope from the fact many people would have had a similar perspective on Segregation back in the 40s -- that it would never change. But it did and significantly. With some Faith, I believe we can do the same. --- John <jschmeidler@ruraltel.net> > I suggest that at your trial you become familiar with cases such as > the one listed here. The circumstances of losing your drivers > license a involve important rights. First of all suspended your > license for failure to pay child support is not related the State's > goal of regulating traffic, or licenser of a motor vehicle. If you > would like further research on this topic, please let me know. > The State in restricting your right to travel, must somehow show > that that is related to the stated purpose of making you comply with > a child support order. That would be difficult. Also, without a > drivers license the state is in fact restricting and hampering your > ability to pay. The statute is extortive --- Edward Kruk <kruk@interchange.ubc.ca> > Your strategy is sound, and is exactly the strategy I would use. Do > not cooperate with evil. And above all do not eat the jail > food. But if a supporter brings you food from outside that is made > with love, to sustain you in your battle against Goliath, you might > wish to do them the honour of accepting this. But refuse all food > from the jailers. > My own elderly parents have not seen their grandson for over 5 > years. They are in failing health. Yet again there will be a > Christmas gathering at my parents' place without my beloved son, > Liam, who is now 10. They also have not seen their first grandson > for over 20 years. He is full of hate toward his father and > extended family, having been poisoned by his mother; he was such a > good boy. In both instances the mothers were jealous of the close > bond I had with my son and sought to destroy it--and did. And there > was no shortage of people profiting from my sons' misery--lawyers > and the courts. > My heart is broken, shattered. > I admire the work you are doing, and in my own way I am campaigning > for law reform. I have attached a recent article for your > consideration. Take care, and best wishes in the place of > disaffection in which you find yourself. --- Bill Brantmeyer <daklane2000@yahoo.com> > I wish there were something I could do for you.You and I are very > much alike, as we stand tall and believe so strongly in principles > and each and everyones basic fundamental rights.The rights that were > once guaranteed to all by the now what appears to be the useless (at > least in family court) U.S. Constitution.Those rights that are being > violated and taken from us on a daily basis. And no matter what the > U.S supreme court re-itterates as our rights, family courts seem to > continue to betray their oaths and continue to steal our children, > civil liberties etc.When will this madness end? It has now been > almost 3 yrs since I've seen the faces of my boys...since I've heard > their voices... Another holiday season is passing, now why would I > or any other parent who's children have been kidnapped with all the > support of the state be depressed? (an illness that is unacceptable > in family court, an illness which can and will be used against you). > To all who know the suffering of being forced into being not so much > as a bystander in your children's lives... MAY GOD BLESS AND COMFORT > YOU THIS HOLIDAY SEASON!!! --- dion muncrief <dionmuncr@yahoo.com> > This has been one of the most trying times of your life. I know > personally. My life for the last 17 months have been totally upside > down and inside out! I am one of the lucky ones who took the first > step and filed! If I had been as malicious, as my soon hopefully > ex-wife, there would not be enough basement in a court house. She > has not accused me of any kind of abuse, just negligence. So far I > have paid dearly ($$$$$$), but have never lost in the courts. I > starting reading your the letter to the judge, but realized that I > have to go to work in the morning and your story would not let me do > that any time soon. My prayers are with you my brother. The most > important word I read so far was "DADDY!!!!!!" We are DADDIES, not > fathers! I fathered my children, but I am not their father now, I AM > THEIR DADDIE!!!!!!!!! My twins LOVE their DADDIE! You have my > prayers, my respect, and my love to a fellow DADDIE who also knows > the truth of what is really important in our children's! lives. --- Roger Baril <somaticsmove@yahoo.com> > dear john, i read your letter to the judge and your affidavit. i > face similar things as a good father for my 3 1/2 year old girl. i > am so sorry for you in the way the system has treated you. very > similar to me. i will be most interested in what happens for you in > this case. i commend you greatly sir, for making such a stand in > truth and dignity. do not back down. you are doing a great thing on > behalf of many men who are being denied access to their > children. again, i would provide a letter of support for you if i > can help. i see my girl 10% and we live 2 miles apart in a small > town. this is a tragic loss for lyla with her dad. the mother has a > new boyfriend who has moved in with my daughter now. all of a sudden > there is a big difficulty with this man who has a huge influence to > my little girl while i am way out on the outskirts. it is so wrog > and invasive. it does not make a bit of sense. WHY? are fathers so > disregarded??? best wishes, > dear john, i read the results of your case. i hope you might still > file it to a higher court with the requests that the civil AND > constitutional agenda be addressed and ruled upon. you have a little > momentum and this makes it a good timing. but get a good attorney > that might serve from http://www.fathersrightsny.com/ at 7166358323 > thoughts? roger Well, I would like to appeal. That is why I submitted a formal motion on the constitutional issues before the trial. It is in PDF form at http://www.AKidsRight.Org/support I personally don't have the time/resources to do it alone. I did try with a local Civil Right's law firm, but they weren't interested. If you think you can pitch it to someone you know, I would be very happy to cooperate with them. --- Theresa Martin <allaboutme38@yahoo.com> > I have read (skimmed over) your case and history in dealing with the > Family Courts enough to gain an understanding and give my opinion. > My heart aches for you. > As a single Mother of 4 having to live on welfare without child > support from my first husband after he fled - I was only told by the > system "he could not be located" or "you cannot get blood from a > rock." Now 25 years later he still owes child support. > I would never encourage anyone not to provide for their own but, in > your situation I think you were set up to fail from the beginning. > The Court does not care about anyones best interest -- especially > Dom's. > The denial letter from your x-wife's attorney is so cold and > obviously does not appreciate the rightful, loving bond between a > parent/child does not cost a thing. It's duty and obligations that > keep you motivated. That proves to me you are not a dead-beat > although the Courts opinion would differ. This is legal abuse. You > have stipulated your situation and have not been labeled a > 'criminal' until the Court themselves imposed an unreasonableness > which, obviously could not be obtained as stated for so many years. > I wish the Courts would wipe your slate clean as your son does not > need the money but needs his Father. How dare any government agency > infringe or dictate on that God-Given right. If there is anything I > can do to help your situation, please do not hesitate to ask. I am > all for good parents remaining steadfast and unsinkable in a system > that wrongs the innocent victims at every turn. > Keep the Faith -- For there is a reason you are in this situation > and something positive will come out of it. --- Robert Gartner <planetaryg@yahoo.com> > I am shaking in my bones for you. I hope this is a good and useful > choice. Its hard enough to imagine just yourself but you have your > mother and your son. I could say I know how you feel but I have not > taken a similar position in any protest. I will be hoping for great > success for this situation. I sent the letter to all the entities > this morning at 400 AM. > I am writing to you in support of Mr. John Murtari and his trial > Monday, December 12, 2005 in Lyons, NY, 08:30AM in the Village > Court. He is on trial for driving without a drivers license. > What makes this situation noteworthy and unique is that he has > driven a hundred times without a license since his license was > revoked for alleged nonpayment of child support monies. He has since > informed the court and the judge that he has done so not once but a > hundred times. > He loves his child and believes that the assessment for the child > support money is unjust. His story is available on his web site > listed at the bottom of this letter. He believes that nobody should > be forced to lose their license either especially when they are > caring for an 89 year old mother in her final days. > I am in support of Mr. Murtari because the state has turned a father > into a billfold. The state is systematically abusing the children of > separated households because it routinely ignores and denies a > child's inherent right to each and both parents on an EQUAL > BASIS. The state in more recent times with so called Federal > 'welfare reform' is especially interested in making a father a money > machine. States enjoy one of eight dollars it collects form these > fathers. Therefore, the state has turned children and fathers into a > business for generating cash for itself. It has every reason NOT to > allow equal custody to each and both parents. This is predation on > humanity by the government. > I am in support of Mr John Murtari as well because the state does > not respect any part of the relationship this affected child may or > may not have with the so called non custodial parent. Those who are > in custody routinely subvert and undermine access and relationship > with the so called NCP. No penalty is imposed upon the > perpetrators. The father, usually, is thus destroyed except as I > said for his money. The state does nothing. > I am such a victim of similar circumstances. One of my children I > have NEVER SEEN yet her mother gets the money monthly. My daughter > is now ten years old and lives within 15 miles of me. It would be up > to me to sue to see my daughter but I am destitute.The state does > not care. The state actually used the allegations against me made > about me regarding my older daughter to try to limit and destroy any > chance I might have to have a second daughter. > I am such a victim with my older daughter. She is nineteen now and > totally parentally alienated from me. This is true even after she > resided with me form the time she was eighteen months till she was > six and one half. Then a zealous advocacy group slam dunked me > accusing me of child sexual abuse. I just learned that her mother > was out committing a major felony while she got the free help from > this group. Again the state does not care one twit about these > circumstances. > John Murtari is a brave man not unlike Rosa Parks or Martin Luther > King. He represents me and millions of displaced and destroyed > fathers over generations! Two thirds of the children in this country > reside in single parent households. Have you seen the horrible > statistics on the result of a child growing up without a father? > Please be there for John on Monday! --- Robert Smith <ras212@optonline.net> > The following is my letter to the editors and news staff of all the > news organizations in your area. God bless you and your family. > Justice must be served. You have the power of St. Michael and all > the Angels & Saints on your side. > RE: PSNY v. JOHN MURTARI, Trial scheduled Mon. 12/11/05, Village Court - Lyons NY > To Whom It May Concern: > On Monday December 12, 2005 Mr. John Murtari will be tried in the > Village Court of Lyons NY for 100-counts of driving with a suspended > license. John Murtari is a good man who is being prosecuted for > penalties that exist within an unconstitutional law and applied by > the kangaroo NY Family Court - on his limited income he was not able > to pay $55,000 in child support carelessly imposed by the > destructive, corrupt and despicable NYS Family Court. John Murtari, > a taxpayer, a decent, hard-working man, a devoted son to his > terminally ill 89-year-old mother, a loving and nurturing father to > his 12-year-old son, an honorable man who has so far paid $55,000 in > direct support to his son, is having his civil rights violated. He > is considered a "dead beat" dad but he is not, in fact, quite the > opposite. > This in not a case about a murderer, an armed robber, a drug dealer, > a violent offender or career criminal. This is a case that > highlights some of what is wrong within NYS Family Court system, the > NY divorce enterprise, the unfair child support guidelines and the > lack of shared-parenting laws. To convict John Murtari would be a > travesty of justice. To destroy the life of a good man would not > only be criminal but would be a mortal sin. This case cannot be > ignored because it is part of a nationwide problem that needs to > end. > This is a golden opportunity for investigative reporters to begin to > break into the NYS Family Court system sub-culture, to expose the > horrors that all parents and children subjected to it face, to > ferret out the corrupt judges, lawyers, mental-health workers, child > "advocates", and so forth. It is a chance to reveal the > unconstitutional "family" laws that help destroy the lives of > fathers, mothers and children. > This case is the tip of a dangerous iceberg that must be destroyed > before more good lives are ruined. The futures of our children are > at stake! God help us and God bless America. > Sincerely, > Robert Smith -- Webmaster __________________________________________________________________ webmaster@AKidsRight.Org "A Kid's Right to BOTH parents" Toll Free (877) 635-1968(x-211) http://www.AKidsRight.Org/ ======================================= Newsletter mailing list Newsletter@kids-right.org subscribe/unsubscribe info below: http://kids-right.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 12 2006 - 03:12:02 EST |